[chuck-users] STK Modulate -- does it work?

Chris McDaniel ixemul at gmail.com
Wed Jul 2 11:49:08 EDT 2008


That was fast!  I actually tried that but without the s.sync -- hadn't
really noticed that in the docs but it definitely opens some doors :-)

Thanks very much for clearing it up for me

So I have one other question -- can this be used with with STK instruments
that (don't appear to) have a sync member?


On Wed, Jul 2, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi, Chris!
>
>
>>
>> Wondering if someone can explain STK Modulate to me; I just don't seem to
>> get it!
>>
>
> I believe you may be a bit confused and that Modulate is meant as something
> to "modulate" other things with, like a LFO in traditional synths, not as
> something to be "modulated", then  listened to, though of course if the
> ampiltude and frequencty would be set to apropriate values you could listen
> to it as well.
>
>
> Here's a small example I cooked up for you. Note I'm using sync(2) for FM
> modulation, adding m's output to s's frequency. When controlling other Ugens
> or more advanced structures you may want to periodically poll m.last().
>
> =================
> Modulate m => SinOsc s => dac;
> 2 => s.sync;
> 20 => m.vibratoGain;
> 2 => m.vibratoRate;
> 50 => m.randomGain;
>
> minute => now;
> ==============
> Hope that helps,
>
> Kas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20080702/49e51e4d/attachment.htm>


More information about the chuck-users mailing list