[chuck-users] feature ideas

Tom Lieber lieber at princeton.edu
Sat Jun 21 16:03:29 EDT 2008

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think this is to prevent worse issues. If you'd change your class's
> member-function return types that would lead to serious issues with other
> code that was already compiled using those. I think this matter is affected
> by many (if not all?)of the issues affecting the updating of running code.

Or ChucK could drop these data type shenanigans entirely. Really,
who's benefiting?

Also, my small hacking skills, yada-yada. :)

Tom Lieber

More information about the chuck-users mailing list