[chuck-users] feature ideas

[mike clemow]

> Or ChucK could drop these data type shenanigans entirely. Really,
> who's benefiting?

Well, I didn't want to come right out and say it, but dynamic typing
seemed like a no-brainer for a livecoding language.

-mike

On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 4:03 PM, Tom Lieber <lieber at princeton.edu> wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 12:51 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I think this is to prevent worse issues. If you'd change your class's
>> member-function return types that would lead to serious issues with other
>> code that was already compiled using those. I think this matter is affected
>> by many (if not all?)of the issues affecting the updating of running code.
>
> Or ChucK could drop these data type shenanigans entirely. Really,
> who's benefiting?
>
> Also, my small hacking skills, yada-yada. :)
>
> --
> Tom Lieber
> http://AllTom.com/
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>



-- 
http://semiotech.org
http://deadlylittlepills.com/michael