[chuck-users] unsporking [bug?]
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Mon Mar 17 20:29:58 EDT 2008
On 17/03/2008, kevin <vacillates at gmail.com> wrote:
> The syntax errors that were appearing before don't appear in this code
You are right; I do believe this is a area where the compiler and the doc's
differ in opinion. Here I feel the compiler makes the most sense and the
doc's may be out of date.
More generally; I too am a bit surprised by this, not sure how long this bug
has been there,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users