[chuck-users] I like alias-noise and 8bit
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Sun May 18 08:29:54 EDT 2008
2008/5/18 Atte André Jensen <atte.jensen at gmail.com>:
> I'd like to resample a 44100 signal to something like 10K *and* hear the
> alias noise. Also I'd like to resample to lower bitdepth, something like 8
> or 6 bit.
Cool, me too. Morning coffee is a bit late today but it's a Sunday and
there's a nice ChucK puzzle to go with it. Oh, and it's nice coffee :¬)
> 1) How it that most efficiently done with chuck?
Well, quantising in time (sample rate) is without any doubt done most easily
by writing the .last() of some signal to the .next of a Step at the required
Quantising in amplitude (bit depth) means rounding. I think my proposal
below might be quite efficient but I'm not 100% sure there. It does work
fine though and Std has several other rounding schemes you may wish to try
for CPU performance and/or sound quality.
Here you go; This example should be quite clear and suitable for extending
for your own purposes, I think, but if I'm wrong please do shout.
//replace with more interesting signal.
SinOsc my_signal => blackhole;
Step resampled => dac;
//remove shred to quit....
fun void resample()
ms / 8 => dur re_samp_rate;
//set bits here
8 => int bits;
//calculate the maximum integer value of the signal's amplitude at this
Math.pow(2, bits) * .5 => float scale;
//division is expensive and we only need to do it once
1/scale => float downscale;
if (my_signal.last() > 1) 1 => resampled.next;
else if (my_signal.last() < -1) -1 => resampled.next;
//cast to int for cheep&cheerful rounding
//then multiply back into the range
//write result to output
downscale * ( (my_signal.last() * scale) $ int) =>
//samplerate is implicid in controll-rate
re_samp_rate => now;
> 2) I event thought it might be possible for me to implement this as a real
> UGen. My plan would be to start from one of the simple UGens (gain), and
> expand/modify from there, but before even looking into the chuck source, is
> there any documentation about doing this? Should I expect this to be more
> effective in implenenting in chuck-code, and if so about how much? Also.
> supposed I actually succed in making something that works, could it be
> included in future chuck-releases?
I'd also like the following to work but it seems like I can extend Step but
the result will -for some strange reason- not be a Ugen. I'm not the
greatest OOP wizard but I really feel that if I extend Ugen the result
should be a Ugen as well. Right now we can extend it but not actually do
anything with the result.
//example code, doesn't actually work
//this is the offending line
LowRezNoise n => dac;
minute => now;
class LowRezNoise extends Step
ms => dur rate;
spork ~ fakeTick();
fun void freq( float input)
second / input => rate;
fun void fakeTick()
Std.rand2f(-1,1) => this.next;
rate => now;
Hope that helps?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users