[chuck-users] chuck, PD and OSC

[Luigi Rensinghoff]

Hmm

I am mainly a PD User but had a short look into chuck....

For now i cannot grasp the capabilities that a chuck~object brings  
into max or PD, but i am very interested..

Its a shame you didnt use "flext" (you know it ??)

http://www.parasitaere-kapazitaeten.net/ext/flext/

That way we had a PD-object as well..

Since i am not a programmer i cannot do the port, do you think it is  
a lot of effort ???

Thanks Luigi

Am 06.12.2007 um 18:10 schrieb garton at columbia.edu:

> Quoting Stephen Sinclair <radarsat1 at gmail.com>:
>
>> Some day I'd like to see a standardized shared-memory approach to
>> passing OSC messages, which would be insanely fast on a local  
>> machine.
>>  (Though, I believe that local loopback sockets are often implemented
>> using shared memory, and are thus pretty much just as fast.  Not sure
>> if this is the case in Linux, I've been meaning to look it up for a
>> while)
>
> My preference is to dump OSC entirely, and use some kind of
> loadable/imbeddable scheme.  It would be just fun fun fun to put the
> entirety of ChucK into a loadable lib of some kind, and then find the
> entry-points you want from your calling environment and go go go.
>
> This is how [chuck~] works, by the way,
>
>
> brad
> http://music.columbia.edu/~brad
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>