[chuck-users] help understanding lisa

[Kassen]

dan trueman;

er, i coded valueAt() quite some time ago and have been using it for a
> while, but i confess i'm not sure it made it into the last release (my
> fault!).
>

Well, if Eduard is using it that would mean it would be in there, right?
Maybe that's naive reasoning again :¬).

Anyway, I don't think there is any reason to apologise for adding features.


> i can't check it into cvs at the moment because i have a mess of other
> stuff in LiSa (multichannel LiSa) that doesn't work properly yet, but if i
> can't get that cleaned up soon, i'll revert and get valueAt checked in.
> sorry about this!
>

That sounds good! I was also talking with Mike about LiSa for granular
usage. I think the linear ramps that we have now are good for avoiding
clicks in loops but they do tend to place a spectral footprint on shorter,
denser grains. I wonder if there would be some way to have more advanced
per-voice windowing/enveloping without the syntactic or CPU overhead getting
too bad?

Might be a thought for a future update?

Yours,
Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20081106/d77f5d94/attachment.html>