[chuck-users] help understanding lisa
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Thu Nov 6 05:00:23 EST 2008
er, i coded valueAt() quite some time ago and have been using it for a
> while, but i confess i'm not sure it made it into the last release (my
Well, if Eduard is using it that would mean it would be in there, right?
Maybe that's naive reasoning again :¬).
Anyway, I don't think there is any reason to apologise for adding features.
> i can't check it into cvs at the moment because i have a mess of other
> stuff in LiSa (multichannel LiSa) that doesn't work properly yet, but if i
> can't get that cleaned up soon, i'll revert and get valueAt checked in.
> sorry about this!
That sounds good! I was also talking with Mike about LiSa for granular
usage. I think the linear ramps that we have now are good for avoiding
clicks in loops but they do tend to place a spectral footprint on shorter,
denser grains. I wonder if there would be some way to have more advanced
per-voice windowing/enveloping without the syntactic or CPU overhead getting
Might be a thought for a future update?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users