[chuck-users] LiSa .rate() issue (bug)

[dan trueman]

yeah, i can reproduce it. i tried it with SndBuf to see if it has the  
same problem, which it doesn't, so then i compared the source code,  
and the only difference is that SndBuf uses GET_CK_FLOAT(ARGS) to get  
the float, whereas LiSa uses GET_NEXT_FLOAT(ARGS). i'd rather find  
out from Ge what the issues are before trying to fix this by using  
GET_CK instead of GET_NEXT, cause i don't know what else might break  
in the meantime....

thanks for tracking this down,
dt

On Nov 9, 2008, at 8:48 AM, Kassen wrote:

>
>
> 2008/11/9 dan trueman <dtrueman at princeton.edu>
> a mystery to me as well!
>
> But you can reproduce it, right? I saw the same thing happen on the  
> latest plain Linux version and on the ASIO build Steve did.
>
> At least if you find it mysterious as well I won't have to feel as  
> bad about hunting for this for so long. I was starting to  
> imagine .playPos() was resetting the rate now and things like that.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20081109/cac5e787/attachment.html>