[chuck-users] now v.s. actual time

Stephen Sinclair radarsat1 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 20:35:11 EDT 2008

On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 7:44 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
> No, that seems about right, in fact I'd say "realnow => now" ought to do,
> even. That just leaves the question of where we'd get a "realnow". If we'd
> get a "realnow" as a proper language abstraction that would deal with a lot
> though I'd say "realnow" for the HD may not be the same as for the CPU.
> To put it in other words; ChucK lets us deal with a VM which is very
> pleasant as the VM is much simpler then a actual computer but the limits of
> the host computer may be relevant for what we'd like to tell the VM.

I like "realnow => now" very much.  That's a great syntax for it.  ;-)

I'm sure some kind of pun could be used here, but it's not coming to
me... "nowreally" is the best I could come up with.


More information about the chuck-users mailing list