[chuck-users] determining the type of an Object in code
heuermh at gmail.com
Mon Sep 8 13:04:10 EDT 2008
mike clemow wrote:
> A proposal:
> This is great stuff, actually. I'm really excited about the prospect
> of putting together a really great List/Collection/Array class lib so
> that we no longer have to look on in envy of SuperCollider's arrays
> (just speaking from experience here ;-).
> I'm totally willing to re-work my current code, which abstracts a
> pattern of grain definitions for granular synthesis, to use or extend
> a more abstract superclass of objects in an array. I have time to
> work on this (and get course credit for it, happily).
> So, there's Michael's List, ListArray, etc classes and we also have
> heard from Dan, who's working on something similar. I'm wondering if
> we can pool our efforts and make something really useful and complete.
> Is there any interest in this? If yes, how should we go about setting this up?
Hopefully we can invite "Mies" into the mix:
More information about the chuck-users