[chuck-users] Playing with fire

Lucas Samaruga samarugalucas at gmail.com
Sat Aug 22 13:43:15 EDT 2009


I was referring to the musical style.
I think the recursion is very good in this case.
I don't understand this cast to UGens not defined

        1.0 / n => (bar $ Phasor).phase;
        (n%3) + 1 => (bar $ PulseOsc).sync;
        (75 * (n-1)) + 1 => bar.gain;
        (5 * n) => (bar $ Shakers).freq;

cheers
Lucas


2009/8/21 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> Lucas;
>
>
>> A bit irritant but nice :-)D
>> some SuperCollider style here.
>>
>
> Almost; I've been writing a fair amount of Scheme lately, that's where the
> recursion comes from. I do think SC sometimes uses arrays like that... it's
> viable in ChucK for quick hacks but I can't yet get ChucK to loop over them,
> at least not without getting extremely silly, unreadable and leaky.
>
> In Scheme I'm how having the opposite, my natural inclination is to use a
> lot of "define" where in a lot of places a "Lambda" would do.
>
> Oh, well... :-)
>
> Kas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>


More information about the chuck-users mailing list