[chuck-users] Playing with fire
samarugalucas at gmail.com
Sat Aug 22 13:43:15 EDT 2009
I was referring to the musical style.
I think the recursion is very good in this case.
I don't understand this cast to UGens not defined
1.0 / n => (bar $ Phasor).phase;
(n%3) + 1 => (bar $ PulseOsc).sync;
(75 * (n-1)) + 1 => bar.gain;
(5 * n) => (bar $ Shakers).freq;
2009/8/21 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
>> A bit irritant but nice :-)D
>> some SuperCollider style here.
> Almost; I've been writing a fair amount of Scheme lately, that's where the
> recursion comes from. I do think SC sometimes uses arrays like that... it's
> viable in ChucK for quick hacks but I can't yet get ChucK to loop over them,
> at least not without getting extremely silly, unreadable and leaky.
> In Scheme I'm how having the opposite, my natural inclination is to use a
> lot of "define" where in a lot of places a "Lambda" would do.
> Oh, well... :-)
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
More information about the chuck-users