[chuck-users] Playing with fire

[Lucas Samaruga]

ah, is part of the code art?

2009/8/22 Lucas Samaruga <samarugalucas at gmail.com>:
> I was referring to the musical style.
> I think the recursion is very good in this case.
> I don't understand this cast to UGens not defined
>
>        1.0 / n => (bar $ Phasor).phase;
>        (n%3) + 1 => (bar $ PulseOsc).sync;
>        (75 * (n-1)) + 1 => bar.gain;
>        (5 * n) => (bar $ Shakers).freq;
>
> cheers
> Lucas
>
>
> 2009/8/21 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
>> Lucas;
>>
>>
>>> A bit irritant but nice :-)D
>>> some SuperCollider style here.
>>>
>>
>> Almost; I've been writing a fair amount of Scheme lately, that's where the
>> recursion comes from. I do think SC sometimes uses arrays like that... it's
>> viable in ChucK for quick hacks but I can't yet get ChucK to loop over them,
>> at least not without getting extremely silly, unreadable and leaky.
>>
>> In Scheme I'm how having the opposite, my natural inclination is to use a
>> lot of "define" where in a lot of places a "Lambda" would do.
>>
>> Oh, well... :-)
>>
>> Kas.
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>
>