[chuck-users] FLOSS (user editable) manual for ChucK

Scott Hewitt wittlist at googlemail.com
Tue Dec 1 22:15:02 EST 2009


Perhaps we could all work on the wiki or in google wave (I have a few
invites if people need them) and then once the content is done work
out the presentation side.

The pdf manual is a great resource and the easy of turning it into a
physical object is great, I actually took my paper copy to the pub for
a few nights when I first started chuck.

However good documentation in my mind would also have a role online as
part of the wiki and maybe eventually as an integrated help system
perhaps within the miniAudicle.

So I would suggest that we aim to create / update the content of the
manual in a way which is as flexible as possible going forward.

just my two cents :)


On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 9:13 PM, Tomasz Kaye's brain
<tomasz.brain at gmail.com> wrote:
> Good points Adam. A couple of related comments:
> On Sat, Nov 28, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Adam Tindale <adamtindale at hotmail.com> wrote:
>> Upon further investigation there are a few other downsides to FLOSS manuals:
>>  There is no provision for sections, just chapters
> Judging from the existing manuals (looking at the bypassing internet
> censorship one as an example), although the chapter is the main unit,
> it looks like subheadings are taken into account too, at least when
> generating PDF indexes.
>>  The document is created with HTML so layout possibilities are
>> limited not only by that markup but what the site is able to translate
>> to PDF
> True. It may not be possible to get a 1-to-1 formatting transfer from
> how the current manual is.
>>  The PDFs don't look very good. CSS editing is possible but that
>> would probably require one person doing that for most of the day
> Although the initial styling work would be a pain, it might only be
> necessary to do it once. I'm sure I'm not the only one here, but I'm
> fairly handy with CSS (though I'm no designer or typesetter) and
> wouldn't mind smartening it up with some rules in case better
> qualified users aren't available.
>>  The filenames of the downloaded items seems to be fixed to something I don't like
> Yeah the filenames of the exported PDFs are ugly, and non-descriptive,
> which is a shame. Of course the exports that are destined for
> distribution would get renamed.
>>  The file sizes of the PDFs are huge
> The internet censorship manual is around 8Mb, but I noticed it has
> lots of images, which I imagine are making it heavier.
>>  Making a title page doesn't seem as easy as it should be
> Agreed.
>> It will take some time to get our current manual into their site to start changing it
> Yes. Perhaps this could go relatively quickly if its a task we could
> split among several people.
>> December 16th is in my calendar, is it in yours?
> It is.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

More information about the chuck-users mailing list