[chuck-users] FLOSS (user editable) manual for ChucK

[mike clemow]

This looks great!  I'm going to join you all later this week.

Excitedly,
Mike

2009/12/18 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>

> Some more notes;
>
> We may need some more stylistic guidelines. There are a lot of sentence
> fragments (as opposed to full sentences) in the manual and considering the
> subject matter and the need to frequently break up sentences to illustrate
> matters in code that seems unavoidable, but I started capitalising those. I
> think this improves readability.
>
> I also need to apologise to Tomasz as I mistakenly attributed the sentence
> "In its own screwed-up way, this is kind of nice because....." to him, took
> it out, then send him a off-list note commenting on the usage of crude
> language in official documents in a way that I -at the time- thought was
> amusingly self-referential.
>
> It turns out that line is from the original pdf. For all I know it was Ge
> himself pointing out the "screwedupness" of the ChucK operator. That was
> completely my mistake.
>
> On the bright side; I cleaned up that paragraph and will document --shell
> tonight in penance over my screw-up.
>
> Kas.
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>


-- 
http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20091219/85bcdbad/attachment.html>