[chuck-users] Status on running shreds?
lieber at princeton.edu
Mon Jan 5 05:45:48 EST 2009
2009/1/5 Arjan Scherpenisse <arjan at scherpenisse.net>:
> Tom Lieber wrote:
>> Well miniAudicle "owns" its ChucK server; you could take that
>> approach. At the very least I mean spawning the ChucK server so that
>> you have its stdout.
> Jep, I was thinking about that too.. but ideally i'd prefer a separate
> server process so multiple instances could hook into it at the same time.
A wrapper script for chuck which serves its output on a socket?
More information about the chuck-users