[chuck-users] parent and children classes (I meant polymorphism)

Michael Heuer heuermh at gmail.com
Wed Jan 21 17:15:24 EST 2009


Wow, it's hard to keep up with you guys!

As you inferred, my ArrayList, its Iterator, the forEach method, etc.
all use indexed array access.

   michael


On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:05 PM, mike clemow <gelfmuse at gmail.com> wrote:
> Done.
>
> Thanks, folks!
>
> -mc
>
> On Wed, Jan 21, 2009 at 4:48 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Mike,
>>
>>>
>>> Yeah, that implementation is a good work around.  I agree about
>>> popBack() going on the bug list.
>>
>> We agree; very good.
>>
>>>
>>> Where should I post this?
>>
>> I'd say on the WiKi on the "bugs hopefully fixed in the next release" page.
>> I post everything there, I always have high hopes for the next release ;¬).
>>
>> We've seen similar things with arrays and Ge knows there are some issues
>> there, I don't think this is a entirely new thing, it seems more like a new
>> expression of the stuff we saw before.
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>
>
>
>
> --
> http://michaelclemow.com
> http://semiotech.org
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>


More information about the chuck-users mailing list