[chuck-users] Library-Like Code
Michael Heuer
heuermh at gmail.com
Thu Jan 29 17:21:52 EST 2009
Nice, that is available at all the hosting sites. Not sure I would
try lick.com or lick.org from work though. :)
michael
Rogan Carr <rogan.carr at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm. Lib ChucK => LiCK?
>
> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:30 PM, Michael Heuer <heuermh at gmail.com> wrote:
>> I would also love to get my code off my box and out where others can
>> use (and improve!) it. Git is fine with me. I have accounts on
>> github and gitorious . . . we would just need a decent project name.
>>
>> michael
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:24 PM, Rogan Carr <rogan.carr at gmail.com> wrote:
>>> I'd be happy to contribute. I have tons of libraries that I use.
>>> What if we made a CVS-like repository like we're doing for the chuck
>>> source code? I think it's git? (I haven't set it up yet.)
>>>
>>> Rogan
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 2:05 PM, mike clemow <gelfmuse at gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> Hey all,
>>>>
>>>> I just posted some very primitive (pun intended) Iterator classes for
>>>> arrays of Ints and Floats.
>>>> (http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/Chuck/Lib) I find them useful
>>>> in certain situations. (I think Michael Heuer has some superior
>>>> ArrayList / Iterator code somewhere.)
>>>>
>>>> Now, I'm well aware that most of you have personal class libraries
>>>> that you use to do your thing with Chuck (I do too). There are also
>>>> collections of code out there focusing on specific domains (SMELT,
>>>> etc). I wonder about all this code and whether or not there might be
>>>> some willingness to curate (for lack of better word) a collection of
>>>> library-like code that we might post somewhere--in some package that
>>>> isn't code posted on a wiki.
>>>>
>>>> It's not really a class library... it's not really package... it's
>>>> more like a distribution. But I think that it would be really helpful
>>>> and fun. There's something about posting code to the wiki that really
>>>> makes me cringe. Documentation of code is really what wiki's are good
>>>> for. I think that a downloadable collection with wiki documentation
>>>> would be ideal. I know that this couldn't be any sort of rigorously
>>>> designed library, but we could all incrementally contribute to
>>>> something like this, which I think would be really sweet.
>>>>
>>>> Is anyone into this idea? I'd be glad to set up the chuck/lib page on
>>>> the wiki to this end and organize, if people are into it.
>>>>
>>>> -Mike
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> http://michaelclemow.com
>>>> http://semiotech.org
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list