[chuck-users] assignment (BUG?)
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Mon Jun 1 09:21:37 EDT 2009
> This kind of things seem to be due to a lack of development
> in documentation and/or language.
In this case I suppose the issue is with a disagreement on what proper
behaviour is. I'd rather have a open discussion about that than have
everything determined by a language specification. When the language
specification was written we all had far less of a coherent idea of what
ChucK was or should be than we now do.
I might still have posted about this if the specifications explicitly
demanded the current behaviour without a explanation of *why* it is this
I suppose I agree with you but discussions like this will lead to
developments and specifications. I might go as far as saying there will be
little development if we don't debate.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users