[chuck-users] assignment (BUG?)
tom at alltom.com
Tue Jun 2 00:18:00 EDT 2009
2009/6/1 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> Maybe Tom feels differently, he seems to feel we don't need any assignment
> at all. I don't think I agree with that but it's a interesting idea to say
> the least.
Well Poor's example demonstrated that =>'s automatic dereferencing of
UGen@ types for connecting UGens makes @=> necessary.
More information about the chuck-users