[chuck-users] shreds ARE reclaimed...
haberg at math.su.se
Mon Jun 15 02:56:01 EDT 2009
On 14 Jun 2009, at 23:34, Robert Poor wrote:
> I owe an apology to the ChucK community for spreading incorrect
> information: having played around with Tom Lieber's excellent
> Timeout class, it's clear that ChucK DOES reclaim expired shreds.
It is really a documentation problem :-).
> As compensation for my embarrassment, I'm relieved that my code will
> become a LOT simpler.
It is important to know, but your example still shows that 'chuck' may
not clean up expire threads fast enough. So if one produces a lot of
threads, one may still have to consider reusing them - this might be
needed for conserving time, too.
More information about the chuck-users