[chuck-users] negative zero
rdpoor at gmail.com
Sun Mar 1 02:25:42 EST 2009
Kas is exactly right, but I'm accustomed to languages that provide a
test for negative zero. (On the other hand, I have yet to find
compelling reason that I need to do so.)
On 28 Feb 2009, at 22:02, Kassen wrote:
> It's weirdness, but I can't imagine a program in any language I know
> of actually having trouble parsing -0.0.
> Aren't situations like this the reason why we have standards for the
> representation of floating point numbers? I seem to remember
> something like that.
> Ah, here it is;
> Negative zero is a part of that standard. Sticking to that standard,
> even if it's slightly weird, will probably prevent issues more than
> cause them, I'd imagine.
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users