[chuck-users] "pure"

Andrew Turley aturley at acm.org
Sun May 10 12:44:37 EDT 2009

And I guess you could expand "fun int" into something like "fun,
in't?" which probably only sounds right if you've been hanging out
some drunk Brits.


2009/5/10 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> Ge;
>> Mostly, the motivation for "pure" is so you can end up with function
>> declarations that start with the string "pure fun".
> Yay! We think alike; I still feel that "fun void" must refer to a sort of
> casual, lighthearted nihilism.
> Yours,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

More information about the chuck-users mailing list