[chuck-users] assignment (BUG?)

Tom Lieber tom at alltom.com
Sun May 31 18:37:40 EDT 2009


I don't think there are any satisfying reasons for the current
behavior. File native type references (int @ x) as a feature request
if it's not already. :)

I think @=> is an unnecessary operator. I like the description from
way back that the "@" means "please."

-- 
Tom Lieber
http://AllTom.com/


More information about the chuck-users mailing list