[chuck-users] Newbie envelope glide confusion

[Kassen]

Perry;

Envelope e => blah;
>
> 2.0 => e.target;
>
> This has bitten me more than once.


Me too. Once I need shots.



>  I think
> a great default behavior for an envelope that
> has nothing chucked into it would be to yield
> its current value


I feel the same way but thought I would be the only one to want this. I did
suggest this to a friend who is contemplating designing a analogue envelope
module. The one good thing here is that I tend to call the Step "unity" (for
unity-gain) and I get to write;

true => unity.next;

...that has to be one of the friendliest looking lines of code ever.



>
> I'll try to remember to lobby to get this folded
> into a future version of ChucK.
>
>
+1 vote.

Kas.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20091127/935c2ff9/attachment.htm>