[chuck-users] instrument in function - good idea, or?

[Stefan Blixt]

2009/10/8 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>

>
>
> Normally UGens are defined within the scope of a shred, this may be a
> sporked function or the "main shred", being the code in a file outside of
> any functions or classes.
>
> When the shred a UGen was defined in exits the UGen will be disconnected
> from anything it connected to (I'm not sure everything that connects to the
> Ugen on the other end will also be disconected but that doesn't matter much
> here). Because of this the DAC will no longer poll it for new samples so it
> won't take any CPU anymore. This, in adition to calculation order, is the
> big advantage of the "pull through" model we use for the UGens.
>
> Kas.
>

Cool! Just tried it out in an experiement - I wasn't aware of this
behaviour.

/Stefan

-- 
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20091008/f66cb14f/attachment.html>