[chuck-users] chout and cherr confuse me [BUG?]

Szilveszter Tóth silvestre.toth at gmail.com
Wed Oct 21 08:26:43 EDT 2009


Hi, Ge!

Maybe I missed something on the web site, but I could not find a list for
the fixed bugs that'll probably be included in the next release (including
your "hot" fixes for std* streams).

Is there a "coming soon" feature list somewhere?

Regards,
Szilveszter aka Hillaby

2009/10/21 Ge Wang <ge at ccrma.stanford.edu>

> Alright!  I am happy to report that both .flush() and IO.newline() and "\n"
> triggering flush on chout has been fixed/implemented (I think), along with a
> number of associated "features" fixed.  The code is in CVS and will be
> released with the next version, which we might just release soon!
>
> Thanks again Kassen and all!!
>
> Best,
> Ge!
>
> On Wed, 21 Oct 2009, Kassen wrote:
>
>  Hi, Szilveszter!
>>
>>
>>      I fear that this has to do with buffering (whether a stream is
>>      buffered or not), and if buffered, buffer size makes a
>>      difference, too.
>>
>>      For example, in C/C++, if you want to see the output of a
>>      fprintf() call for sure, you have to call fflush(). I don't know
>>      if it has a ChucK equivalent, though.
>>
>>
>> Ah, we're getting there! This, combined with Ge's last mail and my own
>> report on chout.flush() crashing is going to fix it, or so I hope.
>>
>> Thanks!
>>
>> Kas.
>>
>>
>>
>>  _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20091021/d3f86098/attachment.html>


More information about the chuck-users mailing list