[chuck-users] Are array types really classes ?
Cyrille.Damez at laposte.net
Cyrille.Damez at laposte.net
Thu Sep 3 17:51:02 EDT 2009
On Thursday 03 September 2009 22:17:04 Kassen wrote:
> Wouldn't writing a Vector class, then creating a array of those come down
> to this?
Not quite, because I can't add member functions that would
perform "horizontal" operations (e.g. norm() for vectors, or draw() for
probability arrays).
> We don't have operator overloading right now. At least you can't overload
> them yourself; of course the ChucK operator is quite overloaded.
Indeed. That must have been why I assumed we could.
Thanks for the answers!
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list