[chuck-users] static function overloading
heuermh at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 13:48:24 EDT 2009
Andrew C. Smith wrote:
> Getting OT...
>> but maybe it's useful for the include file trick.
> Wait, is there an include file trick? I thought we just had
> Machine.add(), which requires paths relative to ChucK's run spot.
> Also, wouldn't "#include ..." not work in the same way as C, since
> there can only be one public class per file? I guess it would sort of
> work, but you could only have local classes for the current and
> sporked shreds.
Not that I know of. That, along with the related lack-of-namespace
issue, is my biggest gripe about ChucK.
More information about the chuck-users