[chuck-users] static function overloading

Stefan Blixt stefan.blixt at gmail.com
Tue Sep 8 13:54:03 EDT 2009

Yeah, that's what I meant about the include file trick - maybe I should have
called it the lack-of-include-file-workaround instead :)

On Tue, Sep 8, 2009 at 7:50 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:

> Stefan;
> > I'm personally a bit confused abut
> > the static concept in ChucK, since we can put stuff on "the ground"
> outside
> > class space, but maybe it's useful for the include file trick.
> the main use comes from static members in public classes, which are
> the one and only way to share data (and functions, and UGens....)
> across the whole VM.
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20090908/7674d2b6/attachment.htm>

More information about the chuck-users mailing list