[chuck-users] FLOSS (user editable) manual for ChucK

[Tomasz Kaye's brain]

hi @Kassen

I thought about having the link appear on the wiki homepage
http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK

I imagined it either replacing or being adjacent to the
"ChucK/Manual<http://wiki.cs.princeton.edu/index.php/ChucK/Manual>(manual
errata, updates, etc)" item. If the current version of the FLOSS
manual has addressed all the things mentioned on that page, I guess it can
be retired?

I would have the link point to the 'write' page of the FLOSS system, to
encourage participation: http://en.flossmanuals.net/bin/view/ChucK/WebHome

I'd have the text link read: "ChucK Manual (User editable)"

Thanks!

2010/1/6 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>

> Sure. Tell me where you want it, what to say and where exactly to link to
> and it'll be up within a hour or so.
>
> Kas.
>
> 2010/1/6 Tomasz Kaye's brain <tomasz.brain at gmail.com>
>
> Could someone with publishing access link to the editable FLOSS manual from
>> the chuck wiki?
>>
>> 2009/12/19 mike clemow <michaelclemow at gmail.com>
>>
>> This looks great!  I'm going to join you all later this week.
>>>
>>> Excitedly,
>>> Mike
>>>
>>> 2009/12/18 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>
>>>
>>>> Some more notes;
>>>>
>>>> We may need some more stylistic guidelines. There are a lot of sentence
>>>> fragments (as opposed to full sentences) in the manual and considering the
>>>> subject matter and the need to frequently break up sentences to illustrate
>>>> matters in code that seems unavoidable, but I started capitalising those. I
>>>> think this improves readability.
>>>>
>>>> I also need to apologise to Tomasz as I mistakenly attributed the
>>>> sentence "In its own screwed-up way, this is kind of nice because....." to
>>>> him, took it out, then send him a off-list note commenting on the usage of
>>>> crude language in official documents in a way that I -at the time- thought
>>>> was amusingly self-referential.
>>>>
>>>> It turns out that line is from the original pdf. For all I know it was
>>>> Ge himself pointing out the "screwedupness" of the ChucK operator. That was
>>>> completely my mistake.
>>>>
>>>> On the bright side; I cleaned up that paragraph and will document
>>>> --shell tonight in penance over my screw-up.
>>>>
>>>> Kas.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> http://michaelclemow.com
>>> http://semiotech.org
>>>
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>
>>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>
>>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20100106/fb39eb2a/attachment.html>