[chuck-users] Intraspection - an example of what I'm attempting

[mike clemow]

Kas,

(This conversation is faster that I can keep up with!)

No, not a type: Keyword, more likely a type: Class.  Or, it may be easier to
deal with strings, or arrays of string.  I thought that strings, being
mutable, might be dangerous.  I think that we could get more specific errors
if we had this all built into the language.

Mike



2010/11/9 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>

> Mike;
>
>
>> However, if the reserved word-- SinOsc --could be made equivalent to what
>> was returned from .typeOf() or .className(), then it would be totally great.
>>
>>
> Are you proposing a new type representing "keyword"? I don't think that
> would fly in the long term, unless we could add to the keywords. I still
> want this to -one day- fly:
>
> class Distortion extends UGen
>   {
>   fun float tick() { .....etc...}
>   }
>
>
> Furthermore there are more object types than UGens; so far we only
> discussed UGens but we need a general solution that will be able to deal
> with a array containing -say- objects of type "note" and type "melody" or
> "loop" and whatever. Without needing to implement what would amount to a
> custom type system.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>


-- 
http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20101109/b67802a1/attachment.html>