[chuck-users] "Or"

Joe McMahon mcmahon at ibiblio.org
Fri Sep 3 13:59:04 EDT 2010

2010/9/3 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> I feel that the downside to that is that the charm of "maybe" comes from it
> being a single word that will look exactly like "true" or "false" in
> syntax hilighted code.
> it's the apparent "self-evident-ness" of a keyword that's that unusual that
> creates the appeal to me.

If we made 'likely' (and 'unlikely') chuckable that would make it nice:

   .70 => likely;  /* also sets 'unlikely' to .30 at the same time */
   if (likely)
      1.0 => sample_rate;
      1.5 => sample_rate;

   .90 => likely;
   if (unlikely)

More information about the chuck-users mailing list