mcmahon at ibiblio.org
Fri Sep 3 13:59:04 EDT 2010
2010/9/3 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> I feel that the downside to that is that the charm of "maybe" comes from it
> being a single word that will look exactly like "true" or "false" in
> syntax hilighted code.
> it's the apparent "self-evident-ness" of a keyword that's that unusual that
> creates the appeal to me.
If we made 'likely' (and 'unlikely') chuckable that would make it nice:
.70 => likely; /* also sets 'unlikely' to .30 at the same time */
1.0 => sample_rate;
1.5 => sample_rate;
.90 => likely;
More information about the chuck-users