signal.automatique at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 11:46:11 EDT 2010
It is not having a type system that is causing problems, but that it often
> is a bit underdeveloped.
Yes, and malnourished. >:-)
> For example, if one wants dynamic typing, that can be done by having a type
> by which the other types can be derived dynamically. Then the problems like
> the one above cane be done by introducing a new type.
We can do that for non-primitives, but we can't ask a given object "Hey,
what's your type?". Exactly that is high on my wishlist.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users