[chuck-users] "Or"

Kassen signal.automatique at gmail.com
Sat Sep 4 11:46:11 EDT 2010


It is not having a type system that is causing problems, but that it often
> is a bit underdeveloped.

Yes, and malnourished. >:-)

> For example, if one wants dynamic typing, that can be done by having a type
> by which the other types can be derived dynamically. Then the problems like
> the one above cane be done by introducing a new type.
We can do that for  non-primitives, but we can't ask a given object "Hey,
what's your type?". Exactly that is high on my wishlist.

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20100904/f6bb5803/attachment.htm>

More information about the chuck-users mailing list