[chuck-users] random seed
stefan.blixt at gmail.com
Sun Sep 12 04:26:12 EDT 2010
Yeah sorry, I didn't think that one through - I can see why someone wants to
reproduce a particular sound sample-perfect. My 2 still holds though.
I think reproduction would even be better facilitated by having to instance
a randomizer before using it. If you made a sound based on random values and
you want to add stuff, today there is a risk that the new stuff will mess up
the old stuff, stealing values from the random sequence. If each thing has
its own randomizer, you don't have this problem.
On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Hans Aberg <haberg-1 at telia.com> wrote:
> On 11 Sep 2010, at 22:37, Stefan Blixt wrote:
> Sorry if I'm just acting like my head is made of wood, but 1: why would
>> anyone want to reproduce a chuck program sample-accurately?
> One application is if one is experimenting with different parameters in
> combination with randomizers to produce different kinds of sounds, and then
> want to select a cool combination. With THX Deep Note they did not do so,
> resulting only having the recording.
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users