[chuck-users] random seed

[Stefan Blixt]

Yeah sorry, I didn't think that one through - I can see why someone wants to
reproduce a particular sound sample-perfect. My 2 still holds though.

I think reproduction would even be better facilitated by having to instance
a randomizer before using it. If you made a sound based on random values and
you want to add stuff, today there is a risk that the new stuff will mess up
the old stuff, stealing values from the random sequence. If each thing has
its own randomizer, you don't have this problem.

/Stefan

On Sat, Sep 11, 2010 at 11:58 PM, Hans Aberg <haberg-1 at telia.com> wrote:

> On 11 Sep 2010, at 22:37, Stefan Blixt wrote:
>
>  Sorry if I'm just acting like my head is made of wood, but 1: why would
>> anyone want to reproduce a chuck program sample-accurately?
>>
>
> One application is if one is experimenting with different parameters in
> combination with randomizers to produce different kinds of sounds, and then
> want to select a cool combination. With THX Deep Note they did not do so,
> resulting only having the recording.
>
>
> http://musicthing.blogspot.com/2005/05/tiny-music-makers-pt-3-thx-sound.html
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>



-- 
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20100912/d79d561d/attachment.htm>