[chuck-users] exponential envelope
grackle at mrdevcat.com
Fri Jun 3 12:39:04 EDT 2011
> Yes, that's right. This is because Envelope internally multiplies its shape
> with it's input. To get the behaviour you expect you'd write;
> Step unity => Envelope e;
> 1 => unity.next;
> This is a pattern I use fairly often. "unity" stands for "unity gain". Once
> you have a Step of that name you can re-use it elsewhere in your code. I
> find that quite handy.
> It's been discussed that perhaps this should be the default behaviour for
> Envelopes (including ADSR) that don't get a input, I'd be in favour of that
> and I seem to remember Perry also felt that way.
Okay, so in order to use an Envelope by itself (which is necessary in
this case, as it is otherwise the first item in the chain), we need to
give it an input to multiply, which is the purpose of the Step ugen.
Is that correct?
> What you are doing is wave-shaping the enveloped signal and
> instead you we'd like to wave-shape the envelope, then apply it to the
> signal. In this case we need a additional vca (Voltage Controlled Amplifier)
> Step unity => Envelope e => Gen5 curve => Gain vca; //waveshaped envelope as
> a control voltage
> Noise my_signal => vca => dac; //signal to be enveloped
> 1 => unity.next; //unity gain to make the envelope behave
> 3 => vca.op; //set the vca to multiply
> //set up your Gen5 here, your envelope, write music, etc.
> Aside from the trick with the Step it's all quite standard and
> straightforward stuff that you'd see in any kind of modular synth, but I can
> understand that this is a bit tricky if see it for the first time. It should
> be easier with a updated Envelope and ADSR, I think.
Ah, okay, I got close to this solution but I didn't know how to
multiply signals. I hadn't seen 'op' in the documentation until you
mentioned it and I went searching for it... I think the subject of
connecting multiple chains using Gain in this way is something that
the manual could elaborate upon.
> I hope that helps and I hope there aren't too many bugs in it; I didn't try
> to run any of this ;-)
I'll let you know how it goes. I'm on lunch break at work right now,
but I'll try it out when I get home in a few hours.
More information about the chuck-users