[chuck-users] ChucKchat8
Les Hall
lester.hall at comcast.net
Tue May 17 17:48:42 EDT 2011
On May 17, 2011, at 5:34 PM, Michael Heuer wrote:
> Kassen;
>
>> On 17 May 2011 16:26, Craig Latta <craig at netjam.org> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hmm, no response from the group yet...
>>>
>>> I am strongly in favor of this. :)
>>>
>>
>> Me too. If this aims in the direction I think it does then this kind of
>> thing is where I believe performative coding is (or should be) heading,
>> especially because with a chat interface people from around the world who
>> might normally experience a language barrier (not to mention a geographical
>> one!) could play together.
>
> An obvious next step would be to add chat commands to send/receive OSC
> messages. Or pardon me if that is the way this works already, I
> haven't taken a look yet.
>
> Then I start thinking of the WAN timing/synchronization problem with
> OSC (and MIDI over WIFI too I suppose) and I'm crestfallen. :| Has
> any progress been made in this area?
>
> michael
>
Yes michael, there are text commands sent over OSC that control various features of the music generation and the looping effect (which is simply a pitch shifter). In this particular type of jam there is no concern about timing / synchronization because what we are doing is net-looping. The goal in this type of looping is to use the web as the delay line in a looping configuration. We inject various types of audio and ride the gain and other controls in such a way that a buildup of layers upon layers of sound develops, often with cool sounding results. So clearly there is no need for synchronization here.
Using the public channels of radio.electro-music.com and ChucKchat, we can make various configurations of loopers across multiple computers around the world. I have proposed that we hold a net-looping (if that's a good term for it, i made that up) concert at electro-music sometime in the near future. Anyone is welcome to join us, just stop by the em chatroom.
Les
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list