[chuck-users] chuck vs supercollider?

ronni montoya ronni.montoya at gmail.com
Sat Aug 11 15:43:13 EDT 2012


thank you, i will experiment and ill let you know.


cheers


R.

2012/8/11 Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>:
> On 11 August 2012 17:55, ronni montoya <ronni.montoya at gmail.com> wrote:
>> Hey ! and  where can i find examples in chuck of this one sample
>> feedback stuff ?
>>  I would like to give it a try to these kind of things in chuck and
>> then compare it with supercollider.
>
> I couldn't remember whether we had one so I made you a simple example.
> Here we have a system that uses feedback over a pitch-shifter and a
> lowpass filter.
> Not the best example in the world, I'm sure, but I made it rather
> quickly. Because of the feedback, porting this to something like SC
> should sound different as a extra delay is introduced in the loop.
>
> SinOsc s => Envelope e => PitShift p => LPF f => dac;
> f => Gain feedback => p;
>
> 200 => s.freq;
> .5::second => e.duration;
>
> 1.2 => p.shift;
> 8000 => f.freq;
> .99 => feedback.gain;
>
> .2 => dac.gain;
>
> while(true)
> {
>     1 => e.value;
>     0 => e.target;
>     second => now;
> }
>
> As a bonus example, consider this;
>
> Step s => dac;
>
> while (true)
> {
>     100 * (now / samp) => Math.sin => s.next;
>     samp => now;
> }
>
> Here we imagine that we don't have a SinOsc yet would like to hear a
> sine. Of course we do have a SinOSc and this only gets really
> interesting if you substitute my boring function with your own, which
> I suggest you try.
>
> Do mind your ears, speakers and neighbours, because this kind of
> experiment can and will potentially blow up.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users


More information about the chuck-users mailing list