[chuck-users] chugins

Spencer Salazar spencer at ccrma.stanford.edu
Sat Aug 25 19:19:37 EDT 2012

Hey Kassen,

Thanks for raising these issues. Not including KasFilter in my
repository is definitely an error of omission. We would like to
eventually build a reasonably intelligent, fair, and manageable system
for chugin development/compilation/delivery. I think my current GitHub
repository could grow into something like that, but right now its
basically unofficial documentation/examples.

So I imagine for the time being potential additions/changes to this
unofficial repository could be structured as GitHub pull requests. If
you'd like to do that for KasFilter, that would be great;
alternatively, if its easier, you can send me a tgz of the latest
source code/documentation/examples and I will add it to the repo
myself. Please also ask your friend Casper to do the same, I
definitely intend to also include DelayC in this unofficial repo, if
he is ok with that.


On Sat, Aug 25, 2012 at 8:42 AM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hey Spencer!
> I thought I'd send this to you through the list because it potentially
> affects others. I'll explain things you already know for them.
> You'll remember I (like Caspar) did a ChuGin for testing and fun. I
> wrote it, which wasn't very hard; nearly everything in the C++ that is
> unlike writing your own DSP in a ChucK Shred could be copy-pasted.
> After verifying that this worked and was fun I wrote some
> documentation for it so that others could enjoy it and I seem to
> remember I slapped the GPLv2 on it so that they'd be allowed to enjoy
> it in any way I'd call reasonable.
> All in all a nice package... But let's be honest; I'm no C++ wizard,
> English isn't my first language and I can generally be a bit
> distracted; there are quite possibly a issue or two with it.
> Back when I send it I asked for opinions but while we are being
> realistic; you probably have a lot of other things to review too,
> things that probably do have deadlines.
> Currently my "KasFilter", which is supposed to be a fun "non-clean"
> filter especially suited for kinds of music with a low-aesthetic that
> need a prominent filter, doesn't seem to be centrally distributed.
> I'd like it to be so I'd like to talk about how we can address the
> above in a way that makes everyone happy. For that I'd be perfectly
> willing to run tests, change stuff, etc and generally be a guinea-pig
> for such a process. If we don't I can host it too, but then I foresee
> having to maintain a list of links to ChuGins that people made, with
> all of the inconveniences that might bring.
> What I could for example do is make a GitHub account and request
> privileges to push my work into your repository? That'd centralise
> stuff though not everyone who'd like a few new UGens might be
> comfortable with Git and make.
> Yours,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

More information about the chuck-users mailing list