[chuck-users] functions returning arrays

[Kassen]

On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 03:59:51PM -0500, David Ogborn wrote:
> Hi Kas and Colin,
> 
> Thanks for your help!  When I properly initialized the array (local to the
> function, at least at first) it works - without any need for bumping up the
> reference count.

Great!

I think I remember that the reference count thing only starts
affecting things for non-primitives. Floats are primitives and their
references work differently internally, I think. Here "differently"
should probably be read as "quite well" ;-)


Yours,
Kas.