[chuck-users] functions returning arrays

[mike clemow]

Whatever became of the Chuck shell?

-mike

http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org




On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 4:44 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 04:29:35PM -0500, mike clemow wrote:
>
>> (This will likely get you in trouble with that ref count bug if you
>> use it for objects.  For primitives, it should work just fine.)
>>
>
> Interesting!
>
>> Perhaps we can write a Scheme interpreter in Chuck?  ;)
>
> That would be pleasantly perverse... but I wouldn't try, if I were
> you....
>
> I'm finding that my Scheming and my ChucKing has been quite distinct.
> Lately I've been working on something like SC's "patterns", except way
> more simple and with more focus on interacting with with running
> processes. Scheme seems natural for that, with its REPL.
>
> Every once in a while I think about the original design for the
> ChucK-shell, which seemed to be not unlike that sort of interaction,
> except with the option to navigate the namespace of the running
> program like a sort of directory tree. That seems like something that
> might integrate well with your "stack" idea...
>
> Kas.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users