[chuck-users] interpolated step? (equivalent to max's line)
mike clemow
michaelclemow at gmail.com
Fri Jul 13 15:28:34 EDT 2012
given...
Envelope e
e.last() should return the current value generated. For Envelope class, it
ought to be between 0-1 although for something like SinOsc, values range
between -1 and 1.
You could do
e.last() * maxValue => float currentValue;
It's still a little hairy, but a lot less logic than what you're doing.
Also, in some circumstances you won't need the other shred.
-Mike
http://michaelclemow.com
http://semiotech.org
On Fri, Jul 13, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jordan Orelli <jordanorelli at gmail.com>wrote:
> there's no way to use this to ramp an arbitrary variable, like the
> frequency of a SinOsc, for example, is there? Cause I do stuff like this
> and find it kinda annoying:
>
> SinOsc s => dac;
> 110 => float initial => s.freq;
>
> fun void ramp() {
> 880 => float final;
> 1::ms => dur res;
> 500::ms => dur width;
> (final - initial) / (width / res) => float delta;
> now => time start;
> while(now < start + width) {
> res => now;
> s.freq() + delta => s.freq;
> }
> }
> spork ~ ramp();
>
> 1::second => now;
>
>
>
> On Friday, July 13, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Kassen wrote:
>
> On 13 July 2012 20:17, George Locke <george.locke.maxmsp at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> sweet. guess i might've figured that one out on my own...
>
>
> I understand the problem.
> Like this I have been using it for quite a while, but the need for the
> extra Step, unless it sets some sort of variable scaling, feels a bit
> counter-intuitive. I seem to remember it was Perry who first proposed
> that Envelope without any input should assume a input of 1. That would
> bring it more closely in line with similar objects in other systems.
>
> There is also no problem with asking questions if you looked around a
> bit; the documentation is a bit scattered.
>
> Happy ChucKing,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20120713/efdf7c41/attachment-0001.html>
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list