[chuck-users] is there a way of doing "callbacks" ( i.e. passing function as argument to be called later ) ?
hems.inlet at gmail.com
Tue May 22 18:28:40 EDT 2012
Fucking good answer in no-time ! I fucking love this list !
Actually i would love to know more about chuck source code so i could
somehow help to improve.
I swear chuck is in my priority list, was love at first sight.
lets keep this list hot ( :
On 22 May 2012 23:19, Michael Heuer <heuermh at gmail.com> wrote:
> henrique matias wrote:
> > This is a question Chris did to me and it reminded me some related
> > i forgot to ask:
> > Is there a type "function" or type "Class" ?
> Class yes, function no unfortunately. The workaround I use is small
> "functor" classes, similar in style to inner classes in java. E.g.
> Some doc here (that needs a lot of updating)
> > Is there anyway for "evaluating" a string to chuck code in order to do
> You might be able to hack this by writing to a temp file and
> Machine.add'ing it.
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users