[chuck-users] is there a way of doing "callbacks" ( i.e. passing function as argument to be called later ) ?

[henrique matias]

It will work surely.

Hopefully someone will have some energy soon to put this hack inside a
native function in chuck.

Can't wait to try stuff on the sources.

respect,
peace

On 23 May 2012 16:51, Robert Poor <rdpoor at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Tue, May 22, 2012 at 3:19 PM, Michael Heuer <heuermh at gmail.com> wrote:
> > You might be able to hack [eval] by writing to a temp file and
> Machine.add'ing it.
>
> That is sooo deliciously nasty, and I don't see why it couldn't work.
> I wish I'd thought of it.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20120524/43c9f3a0/attachment.html>