[chuck-users] multiple inheritance
signal.automatique at gmail.com
Fri Oct 5 09:06:17 EDT 2012
On Fri, Oct 05, 2012 at 02:59:16PM +0200, Julien Saint-Martin wrote:
> Hi Kassen,
> Ok, thank you for your response.
> No problem, you don't have to be sorry. I survived ten years programming
> without objects so I will find an other solution ;-)
Personally I never felt the need to extend multiple things at once, to
be honest, I tend more towards having one big object include several
smaller ones. I could see how it could save on the copy-pasting and
keeping track of where you copy-pasted when you edit one case.
More information about the chuck-users