[chuck-users] 1.3.1 not happy with my jack (64-bit)

plutek plutek at infinity.net
Tue Sep 11 08:02:07 EDT 2012

From: Ge Wang <ge at ccrma.stanford.edu>
Date: Mon, 10 Sep 2012 22:57:54 -0700 (PDT)

> Hi all!
> On Mon, 10 Sep 2012, Kassen wrote:
>> On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 01:30:37PM -0700, Fernando Lopez-Lezcano
>> wrote:
>>> I agree that chuck should complain at least, and not fail silently.
>>> It might depend on how rt-audio handles this (maybe there is an
>>> error return being ignored?)
>> Yes. No silent failing and I also think that there is no need to
>> bother the user with typing in numbers that ChucK could find on its
>> own at least as well.
> Definitely agree!  I previously thought there was some kind of error
> reporting, but something seems missing or broken.  Will look into for
> next release!
>> Keeping the "-sr" parameter a option could still be nice, for example
>> if we'd like to set the samplerate because we want to be sure that the
>> system is set up like we want our synth to be.
> Perhaps the behavior on linux/jack should be: try to figure out and
> use the in progress JACK sample rate by default, unless the
> --srate:<N> flag is present, in which case it will try to use the
> specified <N>.  If any unrecoverable, showstopping failure is
> encountered along the way (e.g., can't start audio, hah), then fail
> with clear error message.  Sound good?
> Ge!

as the humble OP for this thread, i'd say that sounds fantastic!  :-)


More information about the chuck-users mailing list