[chuck-users] Fwd: chuck-users Digest, Vol 86, Issue 19
simonsteptoe at yahoo.co.uk
Fri Sep 14 18:51:55 EDT 2012
Good evening Ge...
I've tried r.ck and s.ck out on 188.8.131.52-rc1.. and.... I've yet to make it
crash!! Also my own patches using OSC are performing as before (i.e. on
184.108.40.206) without a hitch. So, as least from my perspective, the latest
fixes seem to have done the job. Thanks.
> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
> From: Ge Wang <ge at ccrma.Stanford.EDU>
> To: ChucK Users Mailing List <chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
> Date: Fri, 14 Sep 2012 06:26:54 -0700 (PDT)
> Subject: Re: [chuck-users] Fwd: chuck 1.3.1 on Windows 32-bit - possible
> OSC issue - update re: 220.127.116.11
> Hi Simon!
> I've tried r.ck and s.ck on 18.104.22.168 and am getting the same issues as
>>> before. Either Chuck crashes immediately or soon after adding s.ck... or if
>>> things proceed, removing r.ck causes the crash. And it does seem the
>>> longer you leave things running, the more certain you'll get a crash when
>>> removing r.ck.
>> This is super helpful - we'll look into it starting on windows 32-bit (
>> s.ck and r.ck seems OK on OS X). Thank you!
> Alrighty, we've found at least one issue that was definitely a potential
> culprit on 32-bit (all os) and only since the 64-bit release. basically,
> float and complex local variables where not being properly popped from the
> operand stack correctly.
> I uploaded a build (22.214.171.124-rc1) for you as well as for Michael and anyone
> else who may want to test particular issues:
> It includes a win32 build and an osx64 build, as well as source for all
> supported platforms.
> If you'd like, please give it a spin!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the chuck-users