[chuck-users] LiSa => anything but dac?

[Dan Trueman]

are you using the most current version of ChucK/mA? that one is working for me as expected: LiSa lisa => dac, without any channel assignment…

dt

On Apr 9, 2013, at 8:49 AM, Joel Matthys <jwmatthys at yahoo.com> wrote:

> Yes, it works if I put a Mix2 after LiSa:
> 
> adc => LiSa lisa => Mix2 mono => NRev reverb => dac;
> 
> So LiSa is acting like a stereo object. However, if I use:
> 
>   adc => LiSa lisa => dac;
> 
> lisa.pan has no effect, and I get no sound from either
> lisa.chan(0) => dac;
> or lisa.chan(1) => dac;
> 
> So stereo output is not quite working right.
> 
> Anyway, Mix2 solved my problem, so all is good for me.
> 
> Joel
> 
> On 04/09/2013 08:36 AM, Jeff Albert wrote:
>> I have used this code:
>> 
>> adc => LiSa slotone => Pan2 pan => Gain g => dac;
>> 
>> which has worked. Again, the LiSa is chucked to an object that takes stereo input. What happens if you put your chorus between the Mix2 and the dac?
>> 
>> 
>> --
>> Jeff Albert
>> Assistant Professor (Extraordinary) of Music Industry Studies
>> Loyola University New Orleans
>> Office: Communications/Music Complex 428P
>> Office Phone: (504) 865-2606
>> Google Voice: (504) 315-5167
>> jvalbert at loyno.edu
>> http://www.loyno.edu/~jvalbert
>> 
>> On Monday, April 8, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Joel Matthys wrote:
>> 
>>> Strange, that doesn't work either, but lisa => Mix2 mono => dac works.
>>> 
>>> Joel
>>> 
>>> On 04/08/2013 11:28 PM, Dan Trueman wrote:
>>>> yes a multichannel bug. try lisa.chan(0) => dac.
>>>> 
>>>> dt
>>>> 
>>>> On Apr 8, 2013, at 10:13 PM, Joel Matthys <jwmatthys at yahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi all. I'm not able to get sound from LiSa unless it connects directly to the dac.
>>>>> 
>>>>> This simple example gives me nothing but silence:
>>>>> 
>>>>> Noise n => LiSa lisa => Chorus c => dac; // lisa => dac works
>>>>> 0.1 => n.gain;
>>>>> 2::second => lisa.duration;
>>>>> 
>>>>> 1 => lisa.record;
>>>>> 2::second => now;
>>>>> 0 => lisa.record;
>>>>> 1 => lisa.play;
>>>>> 2::second => now;
>>>>> 
>>>>> Is there something I'm overlooking here?
>>>>> 
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Joel
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> chuck-users mailing list
>>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> chuck-users mailing list
>> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
> 
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users

-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20130409/e6b940b6/attachment-0001.html>