[chuck-users] Latest on subclassing UGen within ChucK?

Scott Hewitt witt0191 at gmail.com
Fri Feb 22 18:11:10 EST 2013

I am writing like crazy for other things but perhaps it would be worth
having another manual update binge in the near future.

Just an thought out loud at the moment classic,

Do => future

On Feb 22, 2013 7:25 PM, "Kassen" <signal.automatique at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 09:55:14AM -0800, Chris Harris wrote:
> >
> > Oh, you must mean the dev list? I was wondering if I was getting too
> > technical here anyway.
> Well, the original topic of extending UGen was very much topical from
> a user perspective. It should be ok to get "technical" on a list about
> a programming language. Proposed solutions might indeed be a "-dev"
> issue.. the line can get a bit blurry.
> I'm sure that as long as you make some attempt to do The Right Thing
> nobody will be angry about what you do.
> Yours,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20130222/000a0f3f/attachment.htm>

More information about the chuck-users mailing list