[chuck-users] chuck --probe output: not stdout
Stefan Blixt
stefan.blixt at gmail.com
Thu Feb 28 16:46:10 EST 2013
Kassen, on unix stderr ends up in the console, the issue (if I understand
correctly) is when you want to pipe the output of chuck --probe to a file.
I just tried chuck -h > file.txt, and it's the same there, file.txt ends up
empty and I get the help output on the console. I'd say it's a bug, plain
and simple - unix apps don't commonly behave that way.
/Stefan
On Thu, Feb 28, 2013 at 7:40 PM, Kassen <signal.automatique at gmail.com>wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 01, 2013 at 01:14:02AM +0800, Ge Wang wrote:
> > >To err is human... but to really screw things up, code it in ChucK.
> ;)
> >
> > yessss -- so true!! gonna save this to the List of Chuckian Wisdom.
> >
> Can we also revive "powertools can maim" as a slogan?
>
> >
> > all (or at least most) of chuck system output/log is to stderr... I
> > can't quite remember why... -- I think it's to avoid issues
> > regarding buffering on the stdout stream. For example, it's
> > possible for a crash to occur right after printing an important
> > message to stdout, but the text may or may not actually print
> > without an explicit flush. This does not happen with stderr.
>
> That is all good and well, but not very satisfactory. We now need to
> wonder why Stderr does not end up in the console where it belongs in
> that configuration.
>
> I'd want to see my errors, they are nice to collect and occasionally
> even useful for diagnostics.
>
> Yours,
> Kas.
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
--
Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.cs.princeton.edu/pipermail/chuck-users/attachments/20130228/01640f4f/attachment.html>
More information about the chuck-users
mailing list