[chuck-users] Running scripts sequentially

[Gonzalo]

Delays won't be a problem in this case, this is a test framework, and I 
just want to be able to run all tests at once. But I'd like to avoid the 
shell script situation. Every test needs to load some stuff first, so it 
wouldn't be just calling the scripts one after the other. I'll try the 
Event route, but I'm going to have to structure a bit better my test 
framework. :)

Thanks guys!

Off-topic: am I replying to the list correctly? Let me know otherwise, 
I'm also new to mailing lists, and I don't want to mess things up.



On 22/04/2014 6:24 pm, Stefan Blixt wrote:
> Sure, but Machine.add ought to take some time to access the file system
> and compile too. Anyway, I second the approach using Events, I made the
> script suggestion since it feels like an easier approach.
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 10:07 AM, Szilveszter Tóth
> <silvestre.toth at gmail.com <mailto:silvestre.toth at gmail.com>> wrote:
>
>     Starting a new chuck process would add a random delay, I don't think
>     that is acceptable in a musical context.
>
>
>     2014-04-22 7:57 GMT+02:00 Stefan Blixt <stefan.blixt at gmail.com
>     <mailto:stefan.blixt at gmail.com>>:
>
>         You could try starting each script on its own in a shell script
>         or - if you're on windows - a .bat script:
>
>         chuck file1.ck <http://file1.ck>
>         chuck file2.ck <http://file2.ck>
>         ...
>
>
>         On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 3:04 AM, Gonzalo <gonzalo at dense13.com
>         <mailto:gonzalo at dense13.com>> wrote:
>
>             Hi,
>
>             I'm trying to run multiple .ck files sequentially.
>             Specifically I have a 'master' file that loads all the
>             'child' files via Machine.add. But then of course they run
>             concurrently. For now I'm just advancing time in the master
>             file before every Machine.add statement (ugly...). Is there
>             a way to accomplish this nicely?
>
>             Thanks!
>             Gonzalo
>
>
>             PS: This is my first message to this list. I'm working on a
>             project with Chuck that raises *a lot* of questions, so I'll
>             probably be coming back here often. :)
>             _________________________________________________
>             chuck-users mailing list
>             chuck-users at lists.cs.__princeton.edu
>             <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>             https://lists.cs.princeton.__edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-__users
>             <https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users>
>
>
>
>
>         --
>         Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
>
>         _______________________________________________
>         chuck-users mailing list
>         chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>         <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>         https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
>
>     _______________________________________________
>     chuck-users mailing list
>     chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
>     <mailto:chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu>
>     https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>
>
>
>
> --
> Release me, insect, or I will destroy the Cosmos!
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> chuck-users mailing list
> chuck-users at lists.cs.princeton.edu
> https://lists.cs.princeton.edu/mailman/listinfo/chuck-users
>